Thanks Karthik. I think CONTAINS() is probably part of the solution. If I
was going to create a new field just for “Fred Reho”’s numbers, then
CONTAINS() would certainly be able to pull data from the appropriate
categories (i.e., “Fred Reho” “House/Rogers”,etc.) and put it in a new
field for summing.
But I’d like to avoid creating new fields in the data table if possible.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Karthik Venkatachalam <